Brucker Law News Law and legal news from Abel Brucker
  • Home
  • Law Firms
  • General Law
  • Tax Law
  • Internet Law
  • Lawyers
  • US Legal News
  • General Law

The GDPR Jungle

May 22, 2018 / KTH Law / 0 Comments

Companies including Marriott, British Airways and Dixons Carphone are some of the high-profile names that have revealed data breaches impacting hundreds of millions of people, although it’s not yet certain whether all of these will be considered under GDPR.

Before GDPR was implemented, there were only a small number of industry sectors, including banking and telecoms, that faced obligations to report a data breach. Under the new regulations, companies in every industry are required to notify customers and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) of a data breach within 72 hours.

It’s therefore not surprising that a recent study indicates there has been a rise in reported data breaches since the implementation of GDPR, with law firm DLA Piper revealing that 59,000 data breaches have been reported across Europe since May 2018, 10,600 of which were in the UK.

This report highlights the scope and scale of today’s threat landscape. Nearly 60,000 data breaches in nine months may sound extremely high, but it’s not necessarily surprising. Intelligent, sophisticated and manipulative, today’s hackers are a force to be reckoned with. However, the regulations are not an opportunity for the government to catch out “bad” companies; it is a practice that aims to better protect customers and consumers.

This also doesn’t mean that there has been an increase in cyber security incidents; instead businesses are now obligated to report these incidents and are likely treading carefully. They can no longer sweep them under the carpet in the hope that no one will ever find out – the threat of a €20m fine or 4 per cent of their annual turnover was more than enough for businesses to sit up and take notice. More: https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2019/02/the-gdpr-jungle-how-are-we-coping-nine-months-on/

EU GDPR

« Anonymous online trademark infringer can be identified through subpoena to domain registrar
Mental Health Question On Bar Exam Application »

Recent Posts

  • Luật sư Quãng Ngãi
  • SaaS agreement lawyer Toronto
  • Immigration lawyer New York
  • Top AI marketing platform for law and legal firms from FirmPilot
  • LegalPeak lawyer directory – Looking for a lawyer?

Tags

bar Boston business California DC Law Firms divorce EU exam Freedom Of Speech GDPR Harassment health check housing policy immigration infringer international law Ireland law cases law news Law Office law service legal mental news online tax technical law trademark UK Wilmington

Archives

  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • January 2021
  • May 2020
  • February 2020
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018

Info

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Theme by The WP Club. | Proudly powered by WordPress